Martin Luther King And The Case For Enlightened Cowardice; Obama Is Eating The Fruit

Martin Luther King, 1964

Image via Wikipedia

Today the US, nay, the world remembers Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., the inspirational African-American civil rights lead that was assassinated in April 1968. He would have turned 83 this year if he hadn’t been finished off.

I think it was in 2001. The Americans had just moved in their new embassy fortress in the outskirts of the Uganda capital, Kampala. I was invited together with one of the most sharp-tongued-and-penned female journalists in Uganda, the deceptively petit Lilliane Barenzi. Our task was to mark Martin Luther King essays, and pronounce the winner of the competition.

The question was whether by advocating for non-violent resistance to racial segregation and injustice, Martin Luther had done the right thing or not.

In Uganda at that time, many young people were still drunk on revolution. So there were many essays denouncing Martin Luther King as a sell-out, a wimp who didn’t have the stomach to meet the brutality and abuses of racists with fire, the only language bigots understood.

Some essayists argued that the fact that racism thrives in parts of America today is because King didn’t “confront its foundations”. Instead he became a stooge, who played along with non-violent revolution, and legitimised a racist order.

It was rousing and passionate, but not new.

I can’t remember the name of the writer, but I do the subject of the winning essay.

If I had to write the same essay, I would entitle it “Martin Luther and the case for enlightened cowardice”. The young man wrote that no entrenched power will respond and make changes without being challenged. So Martin Luther and the civil rights movement deserve credit for standing up.

Secondly, he argued that timing was important.  By taking to protest when African-Americans were few, poor, shabbily educated, the threat level they posed to the racist establishment was low, so the authorities didn’t respond with the full firing power they had.

Because of that, the civil rights movement was not a fight to the death – and relatively few people died. Most lived to keep the struggle alive.

Furthermore, because of that and the low lethality, white liberals and other “good Christians” joined King because the risk was manageable, thus broadening the movement beyond America’s black tribes.

In all, King’s genius was knowing to win a little today, spare his troops for another fight tomorrow so they might win another piece, and still have men and women left to carry on the cause.

Not everyone has to die. If the enemy outnumbers you hopelessly, you don’t fight him on his terms. Not every war must be like “300”, where all the Spartans die.

Again, these points had been made in one or the way. It’s just that it was rare to find a young man, who hadn’t been mellowed by the setbacks of life, embracing them.

When African-Americans finally started burning down cities in the Chicago riots, they were more of them than in King’s time. The civil rights movement had also partly contributed to a moral order in which, although the US state was more heavily armed, it could no longer kill as many protestors as it would have in past racist years and got away with it.

Also, the spread of TV meant that the protests and black grievances were amplified more.

These days rappers like 50 Cent sing about “die rich or die trying”. That goal is probably only possibly because 50 years ago African-Americans fought the small but definitive fight – for a seat in the front of the bus. If you can’t be allowed a seat on the bus, you can’t be allowed to become rich.

The anger and angst of inner city black America today can sometimes be frightening. Not just to America, but I guess to the rest of the world because its vehicles, like rap, have made it chic. Rap is the global anti-system and state anthem.

There is a part of me that thinks that it is this extremely radicalised black America that makes it possible for someone like Barack Obama to get elected president.

Maybe deep down, America feels that the only way to clip the anger is to show that there is another way to being a person of colour or minority and finding greatness – and Obama is proof of it.

Martin Luther King’s cowardice has been ennobled. You can’t argue against that. There is still no job like being President of America.

© Charles Onyango-Obbo / twitter@cobbo3

8 Comments on “Martin Luther King And The Case For Enlightened Cowardice; Obama Is Eating The Fruit”

  1. Polycarp K. Mugizi
    January 16, 2012 at 5:58 pm #

    A great leader he was!

  2. BILAL DADAR
    January 18, 2012 at 7:19 am #

    Excellent!

  3. Best Digital Cameras
    January 18, 2012 at 9:15 am #

    An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers
    Nikon Camera Reviews

  4. 844Graduate
    January 23, 2012 at 6:10 pm #

    Rap is not anti system anymore, in fact, it has sold out its soul to consumerism and is now the biggest sound track to runaway American consumerism, i bet you Superbowl 45 will have a rapper to sing along. what anti system is in Lil Wayne, Rick Ross, even the older rappers like snoop dog? good old rap is dead. do you remember the rap song sang for Obama after the election? “my president is black, my Lambo is blue…” really. these new rappers just like Obama are taken up by American popular culture because they are neutered, zero threat to the establishment. Modern day house Negros we can call them

  5. Gilmash
    January 27, 2012 at 9:21 am #

    Taking nothing away from Martin Luther King. He was a great leader. Peace and non violence approach yields more and better results!

  6. Casandra Blanga
    February 13, 2012 at 1:23 am #

    Do you mind if I quote a couple of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your webpage? My website is in the exact same niche as yours and my visitors would certainly benefit from a lot of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Many thanks!

    • nakedchiefs
      February 28, 2012 at 4:38 pm #

      Sorry, was late replying to this. Sure, no problem, as long as use is credited.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Prize winning prose | ikners.com - January 19, 2012

    [...] Martin Luther King And The Case For Enlightened Cowardice; Obama Is Eating The Fruit (nakedchiefs.com) [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 88,117 other followers

%d bloggers like this: